Thinking about last week’s class and readings, I
have to admit that I still haven’t gotten my head 100% around the more
important ideas. On their own I understand (I think!) the concepts of Luhmann’s
social systems theory, Wiener’s cybernetics and posthumanism in general. But
how social systems theory connects to Wiener’s cybernetics, and Wiener’s
cybernetics to posthumanism, I’m not exactly sure, or at least blurry on the
details. I understand that both social systems theory and cybernetics explore
systems. Luhmann discussed how systems are operationally
closed and, and I know that cybernetics involve systems with a closed
signalling loop. The similarities are already very clear. But when Neal talked
about the roots of the word cybernetics, with cyber being the Latin for a boat’s
steersman I began (no pun intended) to get lost. What particularly confused me
was when Neal said that the most important element of the arrangement of
steersman, boat, and water, was the water. I definitely missed something.
We then didn’t get far enough, or have enough time
in class to discuss how cybernetics is related to posthumanism. I have made my
cursory scroll through the cybernetics Wikipedia page to see if there was some
broad, overly simplified explanation, but obviously I feel like I’ve got some
further enlightening to do. The self-organisation and closed signalling loops
of cybernetics explains the systems or robots very well, but I think that’s
only the surface of their connection. That or I’m over-complicating things. But
considering that I want to write about posthuman representations in science
fiction films as part of my research assignment, I feel I need to get a much
better grasp on the concepts of the technology, and exactly how it relates to its
broader, connected theories.
No comments:
Post a Comment