Since I am wanting to write about science fiction
films for my research assignment, I tend to relate every class reading back to
science fiction. And therefore when Hans Moeller discussed the two sides of the
humanist approach to society and technology (particularly posthumanism) at the
beginning of his explanation of social systems theory, I was struck by its
parallels to certain discussions on science fiction. Moeller writes there are
those pessimistic “in the face of waning humaneness” and those optimists who
embrace technology’s “human prospects” (4). This brought to mind Daniel Dinello’s
book that I am (probably) using for my book review assignment, Technophobia! Science Fiction Visions of
Posthuman Technology, where Dinello discusses how scientists working in the
field tend to be blissful optimists, whereas science fiction is pessimistically
attached to the techno-dystopia.
Other research I have come across also stresses
the techno-pessimisim surrounding science fiction. Noga Applebaum accuses
science fiction of endorsing a “technophobic agenda” to young adults, of
essentially creating future technophobes! And then of course there is Susan
Sontag’s famous essay “The Imagination of Disaster” which claimed that “science
fiction films are not about science. They are about disaster”. This bold claim was very useful for studying
science fiction in new ways, although I would argue that it’s about both, the
disaster of science. So then scientists are Mueller’s technology optimists, and
science fiction the pessimists, who are strangely completely enamoured with the
subject of their pessimism.
Interestingly, the most explored technological issue
in science fiction, and most common cause of technological dystopias, is posthumanism,
which Neal says we will be arriving at in tomorrow’s class via social systems
theory. So as a final aside, if we are sticking to the idea that science
fiction is a “humanist” pessimism, what does it say about, and how would it
relate to social systems theory?
Really interesting post. You probably already know it, but if not, I highly recommend Vivian Sobchack's book on Sci-Fi film, Screening Space where she (critically) discusses the widely held view that, while literary SF has been more willing to embrace and explore the utopian, SF film is dystopian by default.
ReplyDeleteThanks for the recommendation, I've been reading Sobchack but not that particular book!
ReplyDelete